​THE MYTH OF JUDICIAL IMMUNITY

Absolute Judicial immunity is a myth.

A Judge does not have absolute immunity.

Judicial immunity does not apply when the following conditions exist:

1. when he is performing a non-judicial act, or
2. when he acts in the complete absence of all jurisdiction.

The following was found as a result of a search for "judicial immunity" at http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/

Judges as Criminals

Hirschfeld v. Rogers Is a state court judge, who has been individually divested of all jurisdiction over a case by virtue of being affirmatively disqualified, who refuses to acknowledge his own divestment, and thereafter commits unconstitutional torts solely under color of the case in which he knows, or should know, that he has lost all jurisdiction, subject to 42 U.S.C. 1981-88 liability?

Suing Judges

Government not Immune in State of Washington

Sherman v. Almeida (Rhode Island), Appelant Brief

Judicial Immunity is not Absolute!

How To Sue A Judge Without Using A Lawyer

Cases

Editorial: Court of Appeal's Expansion of Judicial Immunity Is Unwarranted

Guidelines for Complaints against a Federal judge

next